https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765134 Time spent in the writ petition and in the appeal was directed to be excluded while the appellant pursued the statutory remedy against the show cause notice, and the period for filing the reply was extended by sixty days from receipt of the judgment. The Court did not examine the merits, left all factual and legal contentions open before the Adjudicating Authority, and clarified that any factual observations of the Single Bench stood deleted. The hearing fixed by the Adjudicating Authority was deferred, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. en-us Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765134 Time spent in the writ petition and in the appeal was directed to be excluded while the appellant pursued the statutory remedy against the show cause notice, and the period for filing the reply was extended by sixty days from receipt of the judgment. The Court did not examine the merits, left all factual and legal contentions open before the Adjudicating Authority, and clarified that any factual observations of the Single Bench stood deleted. The hearing fixed by the Adjudicating Authority was deferred, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Case-Laws GST Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765134