https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460446 The SC dismissed the special leave petition as time-barred due to a 462-day delay, which was deemed inexcusable despite the petitioner's claim of counsel change. The Court criticized the State's practice of filing "certificate cases" to fulfill formalities, highlighting it as an abuse of the judicial process. The Court emphasized that government entities must adhere to procedural rules and be accountable for negligent litigation handling. Costs were imposed on the petitioner, with instructions for recovery from the responsible officers, underscoring the need for reform in state litigation practices. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 19:48:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460446 The SC dismissed the special leave petition as time-barred due to a 462-day delay, which was deemed inexcusable despite the petitioner's claim of counsel change. The Court criticized the State's practice of filing "certificate cases" to fulfill formalities, highlighting it as an abuse of the judicial process. The Court emphasized that government entities must adhere to procedural rules and be accountable for negligent litigation handling. Costs were imposed on the petitioner, with instructions for recovery from the responsible officers, underscoring the need for reform in state litigation practices. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460446