<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1669 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460447</link>
    <description>SEBI partially revoked market access restrictions against 113 entities involved in alleged price manipulation of a company&#039;s scrip. The Board found no adverse findings against 104 entities regarding their role in price manipulation, warranting revocation of trading prohibitions. For 9 additional entities, while no price manipulation violations were established, disclosure violations under insider trading and takeover regulations were identified, requiring adjudication proceedings but justifying revocation of interim restrictions. However, SEBI maintained proceedings against the remaining 13 entities where violations under securities laws were observed, continuing their market access prohibitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 19:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1669 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460447</link>
      <description>SEBI partially revoked market access restrictions against 113 entities involved in alleged price manipulation of a company&#039;s scrip. The Board found no adverse findings against 104 entities regarding their role in price manipulation, warranting revocation of trading prohibitions. For 9 additional entities, while no price manipulation violations were established, disclosure violations under insider trading and takeover regulations were identified, requiring adjudication proceedings but justifying revocation of interim restrictions. However, SEBI maintained proceedings against the remaining 13 entities where violations under securities laws were observed, continuing their market access prohibitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>