<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40639</link>
    <description>A uniform discount is deductible in excise assessment only where the scheme applies consistently across the relevant class of buyers; because the assessee&#039;s discount terms differed between customers inside and outside Uttar Pradesh, the concession lacked uniformity and deduction was denied. On limitation, a short-levy demand had to be raised within the three-month period prescribed by Rule 10 from the date of duty payment; Rule 10A could not be used as a residuary basis to bypass that specific limit. The demand was therefore held time-barred and quashed, notwithstanding the adverse finding on the discount scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 16:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40639</link>
      <description>A uniform discount is deductible in excise assessment only where the scheme applies consistently across the relevant class of buyers; because the assessee&#039;s discount terms differed between customers inside and outside Uttar Pradesh, the concession lacked uniformity and deduction was denied. On limitation, a short-levy demand had to be raised within the three-month period prescribed by Rule 10 from the date of duty payment; Rule 10A could not be used as a residuary basis to bypass that specific limit. The demand was therefore held time-barred and quashed, notwithstanding the adverse finding on the discount scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>