<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (3) TMI 14 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40637</link>
    <description>The court directed the authorities to reconsider the petitioners&#039; claim for deduction for quantity discount, as it could amount to a trade discount. The authorities were instructed to modify the order if necessary based on established facts. If any refund became due to the petitioners as a result, it should be processed accordingly. The petition was dismissed, with costs to be borne by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (3) TMI 14 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40637</link>
      <description>The court directed the authorities to reconsider the petitioners&#039; claim for deduction for quantity discount, as it could amount to a trade discount. The authorities were instructed to modify the order if necessary based on established facts. If any refund became due to the petitioners as a result, it should be processed accordingly. The petition was dismissed, with costs to be borne by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>