<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1339 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460444</link>
    <description>In a court auction sale, title passes only to the property actually sold and described in the sale certificate; the Transfer of Property Act provisions governing private transfers do not enlarge that title to include an unmentioned structure. The dakhalnama is only evidence of delivery of possession and does not found title. Admissions in a party&#039;s pleading remain binding unless explained, while a witness&#039;s admission does not bind the party. On the facts stated, no adverse possession was established. The purchaser was entitled only to the open land, while the occupants were entitled to protect possession of the house by injunction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1339 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460444</link>
      <description>In a court auction sale, title passes only to the property actually sold and described in the sale certificate; the Transfer of Property Act provisions governing private transfers do not enlarge that title to include an unmentioned structure. The dakhalnama is only evidence of delivery of possession and does not found title. Admissions in a party&#039;s pleading remain binding unless explained, while a witness&#039;s admission does not bind the party. On the facts stated, no adverse possession was established. The purchaser was entitled only to the open land, while the occupants were entitled to protect possession of the house by injunction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>