https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40635 The court, presided over by K.S. Hegde, J., ruled in favor of the petitioner, a private limited company manufacturing Electric Batteries, in a case challenging the levy made by the First Respondent and the order of the Second Respondent in appeal. The court held that the authorities did not consider all relevant factors in determining the wholesale cash price for excise duty on the Batteries. A Writ of Certiorari was issued to quash the impugned levy, allowing for a fresh assessment in accordance with the law, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 May 2010 15:53:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40635 The court, presided over by K.S. Hegde, J., ruled in favor of the petitioner, a private limited company manufacturing Electric Batteries, in a case challenging the levy made by the First Respondent and the order of the Second Respondent in appeal. The court held that the authorities did not consider all relevant factors in determining the wholesale cash price for excise duty on the Batteries. A Writ of Certiorari was issued to quash the impugned levy, allowing for a fresh assessment in accordance with the law, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40635