<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1429 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460436</link>
    <description>A conditional exemption under Notification No. 22/2003-CE for duty-free procurement by a 100% EOU applied only where the goods were proved to the proper officer to have been used in connection with export production or packaging, or where the notification expressly permitted destruction of specified rejected goods. Goods destroyed by floods before use did not satisfy those conditions, and they could not be treated as rejected goods by stretching the notification beyond its plain terms. Exemption notifications must be strictly construed, and no clause in the notification covered duty remission for loss caused by a natural disaster. The duty demand was therefore sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1429 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460436</link>
      <description>A conditional exemption under Notification No. 22/2003-CE for duty-free procurement by a 100% EOU applied only where the goods were proved to the proper officer to have been used in connection with export production or packaging, or where the notification expressly permitted destruction of specified rejected goods. Goods destroyed by floods before use did not satisfy those conditions, and they could not be treated as rejected goods by stretching the notification beyond its plain terms. Exemption notifications must be strictly construed, and no clause in the notification covered duty remission for loss caused by a natural disaster. The duty demand was therefore sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>