<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2046 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460437</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC declined to grant a fifteen-day stay on the impugned order to enable approach to the Division Bench, noting that the earlier interim order of 15.05.2017 had already clarified that any action taken under Section 43 of the Competition Act, 2002 would remain subject to further orders of the Court. In view of that existing protection, the Court found no basis to pass the requested stay and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2046 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460437</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC declined to grant a fifteen-day stay on the impugned order to enable approach to the Division Bench, noting that the earlier interim order of 15.05.2017 had already clarified that any action taken under Section 43 of the Competition Act, 2002 would remain subject to further orders of the Court. In view of that existing protection, the Court found no basis to pass the requested stay and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>