<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1428 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460441</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat held that genuine LTCG from sale of listed shares on stock exchange platform cannot be treated as non-genuine arranged LTCG under section 68. The tribunal found that transactions were conducted through BSE with security transaction tax paid, and no allegations existed against the share broker regarding bogus transactions or price manipulation. Following precedent from Bombay HC in PCIT vs. Indravadan Jain HUF, mere SEBI investigation against broker insufficient to deem assessee&#039;s transactions ingenuine. Addition under section 68 deleted for lack of cogent evidence. Consequential addition of commission expenses under section 69A also deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1428 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460441</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat held that genuine LTCG from sale of listed shares on stock exchange platform cannot be treated as non-genuine arranged LTCG under section 68. The tribunal found that transactions were conducted through BSE with security transaction tax paid, and no allegations existed against the share broker regarding bogus transactions or price manipulation. Following precedent from Bombay HC in PCIT vs. Indravadan Jain HUF, mere SEBI investigation against broker insufficient to deem assessee&#039;s transactions ingenuine. Addition under section 68 deleted for lack of cogent evidence. Consequential addition of commission expenses under section 69A also deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>