<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40623</link>
    <description>The court held that paper cutting machinery does not qualify as paper making machinery under Notification No. 18/61 for concessional duty. The judgment emphasized the distinction between machinery that creates paper and machinery that alters paper sizes, ruling in favor of the Government&#039;s decision and dismissing the petitioner&#039;s writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40623</link>
      <description>The court held that paper cutting machinery does not qualify as paper making machinery under Notification No. 18/61 for concessional duty. The judgment emphasized the distinction between machinery that creates paper and machinery that alters paper sizes, ruling in favor of the Government&#039;s decision and dismissing the petitioner&#039;s writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>