<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1095 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765031</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding CESTAT&#039;s conclusion that sale of food and beverages at counters within a cinema complex does not attract service tax as a declared service under ss.65B(44)/66E and that Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 are inapplicable. The impugned CESTAT order dated 30.11.2023 was left undisturbed for lack of any reason to interfere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1095 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765031</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding CESTAT&#039;s conclusion that sale of food and beverages at counters within a cinema complex does not attract service tax as a declared service under ss.65B(44)/66E and that Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 are inapplicable. The impugned CESTAT order dated 30.11.2023 was left undisturbed for lack of any reason to interfere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>