<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1108 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765044</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai decided multiple issues in this transfer pricing case. The tribunal directed deletion of TP adjustments regarding M/s. Northstar Health Care following precedent and ordered recomputation of arm&#039;s length price for cephalexin and Levetiracetam drug sales with proper hearing opportunities. The tribunal deleted additions for rebate provisions, confirming statutory benefits cannot be denied on mere presumption. However, it upheld additions where the assessee claimed differential tax benefits during business restructuring. The tribunal allowed job work expense claims as genuineness was undisputed. For Section 35(2AB) deductions, it directed fresh consideration under Sections 37/32 due to missing Form 3CL. Finally, it disallowed FCCB premium expenses until TDS compliance under Section 40(a)(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1108 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765044</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai decided multiple issues in this transfer pricing case. The tribunal directed deletion of TP adjustments regarding M/s. Northstar Health Care following precedent and ordered recomputation of arm&#039;s length price for cephalexin and Levetiracetam drug sales with proper hearing opportunities. The tribunal deleted additions for rebate provisions, confirming statutory benefits cannot be denied on mere presumption. However, it upheld additions where the assessee claimed differential tax benefits during business restructuring. The tribunal allowed job work expense claims as genuineness was undisputed. For Section 35(2AB) deductions, it directed fresh consideration under Sections 37/32 due to missing Form 3CL. Finally, it disallowed FCCB premium expenses until TDS compliance under Section 40(a)(i).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>