<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765052</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat reduced addition under sections 69/69A from Rs. 72,81,674 to Rs. 2 lakhs after allowing deductions for home loan disbursement (Rs. 44,01,180), section 80TTA deduction (Rs. 2,042), correcting calculation errors (Rs. 19,870), and crediting cash-in-hand from previous year return (Rs. 9,92,080). The remaining unexplained credit was estimated at 10% for business income taxation. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, significantly reducing the tax liability under special rate provisions of section 11BBE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 08:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765052</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat reduced addition under sections 69/69A from Rs. 72,81,674 to Rs. 2 lakhs after allowing deductions for home loan disbursement (Rs. 44,01,180), section 80TTA deduction (Rs. 2,042), correcting calculation errors (Rs. 19,870), and crediting cash-in-hand from previous year return (Rs. 9,92,080). The remaining unexplained credit was estimated at 10% for business income taxation. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, significantly reducing the tax liability under special rate provisions of section 11BBE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>