<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40619</link>
    <description>A statutory bar on suits under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act applies only to acts or orders made in good faith and within the Act&#039;s scope; levies based on an inapplicable provision or on Drugs Rules considerations fell outside that protection, so civil jurisdiction was not excluded. The special limitation period likewise applied only to acts done under the Act, and did not govern a claim for refund of duty illegally collected outside statutory power. Codopyrin, manufactured to a standard formula in the British Pharmacopoeia, was not a patent or proprietary medicine liable to excise duty on the facts considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40619</link>
      <description>A statutory bar on suits under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act applies only to acts or orders made in good faith and within the Act&#039;s scope; levies based on an inapplicable provision or on Drugs Rules considerations fell outside that protection, so civil jurisdiction was not excluded. The special limitation period likewise applied only to acts done under the Act, and did not govern a claim for refund of duty illegally collected outside statutory power. Codopyrin, manufactured to a standard formula in the British Pharmacopoeia, was not a patent or proprietary medicine liable to excise duty on the facts considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>