<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765072</link>
    <description>The SC set aside an order challenging tax discrepancies, allowing the petitioner to pay 10% of disputed taxes and present objections. The court emphasized principles of natural justice, providing an opportunity to explain inconsistencies while ensuring partial tax compliance. The judgment balanced procedural fairness with regulatory enforcement, remanding the matter for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765072</link>
      <description>The SC set aside an order challenging tax discrepancies, allowing the petitioner to pay 10% of disputed taxes and present objections. The court emphasized principles of natural justice, providing an opportunity to explain inconsistencies while ensuring partial tax compliance. The judgment balanced procedural fairness with regulatory enforcement, remanding the matter for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>