<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1139 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765075</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed because the impugned adjudication order was found to be amenable to the statutory appellate remedy. The challenge to Rule 36(4) was treated as having no direct bearing on the issues arising from the adjudication, so the court declined writ interference and left the matter to the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1139 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765075</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed because the impugned adjudication order was found to be amenable to the statutory appellate remedy. The challenge to Rule 36(4) was treated as having no direct bearing on the issues arising from the adjudication, so the court declined writ interference and left the matter to the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>