https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765079 Pending a writ petition challenging the manner of issuance of a show cause notice after a pre-consultation notice under Rule 142(1A) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Court considered only the interim request. It declined to stay the scheduled hearings on the show cause notice, but protected the petitioner by restraining the respondents from passing any adjudication order on the notice until further orders. The operative effect was that the hearing process could continue, while final adjudication remained stayed for the time being. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765079 Pending a writ petition challenging the manner of issuance of a show cause notice after a pre-consultation notice under Rule 142(1A) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Court considered only the interim request. It declined to stay the scheduled hearings on the show cause notice, but protected the petitioner by restraining the respondents from passing any adjudication order on the notice until further orders. The operative effect was that the hearing process could continue, while final adjudication remained stayed for the time being. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765079