<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1668 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460418</link>
    <description>The SC, comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, addressed a Special Leave Petition. The Court condoned the delay in filing and granted an exemption from submitting a certified copy of the impugned order. While the Court showed an inclination to interfere based on the case facts, it left the questions of law open for future determination. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1668 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460418</link>
      <description>The SC, comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, addressed a Special Leave Petition. The Court condoned the delay in filing and granted an exemption from submitting a certified copy of the impugned order. While the Court showed an inclination to interfere based on the case facts, it left the questions of law open for future determination. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>