https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460424 The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding that the applicants demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay. It determined that the order dated 21 December 2022 was interim and conditional, not requiring an immediate appeal. The applicants were not initially parties to the interim application and acted diligently once aware of the final order dated 09 October 2023. The court concluded there was no malafide intent, allowing the appeal to proceed on its merits. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:45:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460424 The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding that the applicants demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay. It determined that the order dated 21 December 2022 was interim and conditional, not requiring an immediate appeal. The applicants were not initially parties to the interim application and acted diligently once aware of the final order dated 09 October 2023. The court concluded there was no malafide intent, allowing the appeal to proceed on its merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460424