https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40606 Writ relief for refund of excise duty was refused because the petitions were filed after substantial delay and the dispute turned on factual questions about the composition of blended yarn and the applicable tariff coverage. Although refund of tax paid under mistake of law can ordinarily be pursued under Article 226, the Court treated the mixed factual controversy and the late approach as making discretionary writ jurisdiction unsuitable. The petitioners were therefore required to seek their remedy in civil court if so advised. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 May 2010 18:09:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40606 Writ relief for refund of excise duty was refused because the petitions were filed after substantial delay and the dispute turned on factual questions about the composition of blended yarn and the applicable tariff coverage. Although refund of tax paid under mistake of law can ordinarily be pursued under Article 226, the Court treated the mixed factual controversy and the late approach as making discretionary writ jurisdiction unsuitable. The petitioners were therefore required to seek their remedy in civil court if so advised. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40606