<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40602</link>
    <description>Gold bearing foreign markings seized from a scooter concealed in the petrol tank triggered the statutory presumption under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. The evidence of seizure officers, the mechanic and an attesting witness, together with the accused&#039;s own statement, showed knowledge of the smuggled nature of the gold and failed to establish lawful possession or indigenous origin. The High Court therefore sustained the conviction for possession and transport of smuggled gold and refused to interfere with the sentence, holding that deterrent punishment was warranted for deliberate evasion of customs controls.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40602</link>
      <description>Gold bearing foreign markings seized from a scooter concealed in the petrol tank triggered the statutory presumption under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. The evidence of seizure officers, the mechanic and an attesting witness, together with the accused&#039;s own statement, showed knowledge of the smuggled nature of the gold and failed to establish lawful possession or indigenous origin. The High Court therefore sustained the conviction for possession and transport of smuggled gold and refused to interfere with the sentence, holding that deterrent punishment was warranted for deliberate evasion of customs controls.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>