<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Grants Final Hearing on GST Dispute After 90% Tax Payment, Orders 25% Deposit Under GST Act 2017.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85115</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.06.2024 concerning GST tax discrepancies. Despite petitioner having already remitted approximately 90% of disputed taxes, court granted one final opportunity to present objections, adhering to principles of natural justice. Petitioner directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks from order receipt. Decision balanced statutory compliance under GST Act, 2017 with procedural fairness, ensuring adequate notice and response opportunity. Respondent&#039;s counsel raised no objection to this arrangement. Matter concluded with petition disposal, emphasizing administrative law principles of fair hearing and reasonable opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:39:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:39:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Grants Final Hearing on GST Dispute After 90% Tax Payment, Orders 25% Deposit Under GST Act 2017.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85115</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.06.2024 concerning GST tax discrepancies. Despite petitioner having already remitted approximately 90% of disputed taxes, court granted one final opportunity to present objections, adhering to principles of natural justice. Petitioner directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks from order receipt. Decision balanced statutory compliance under GST Act, 2017 with procedural fairness, ensuring adequate notice and response opportunity. Respondent&#039;s counsel raised no objection to this arrangement. Matter concluded with petition disposal, emphasizing administrative law principles of fair hearing and reasonable opportunity.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:39:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>