<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1069 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765005</link>
    <description>An assessment order was challenged for alleged non-service of notices and breach of natural justice because the documents were uploaded on the GST portal without effective notice. The Madras HC granted one further opportunity, set aside the assessment order, and directed fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority subject to deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. On compliance, the assessment was to be treated as a show cause notice, objections were to be heard afresh, and the bank attachment was to be lifted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1069 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765005</link>
      <description>An assessment order was challenged for alleged non-service of notices and breach of natural justice because the documents were uploaded on the GST portal without effective notice. The Madras HC granted one further opportunity, set aside the assessment order, and directed fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority subject to deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. On compliance, the assessment was to be treated as a show cause notice, objections were to be heard afresh, and the bank attachment was to be lifted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>