<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40584</link>
    <description>Where a taxing statute gives finality to assessment orders and provides appellate and revisional remedies, a civil suit will not lie merely to challenge the correctness of the assessment or the demand quantified under it. Here, the assessment had already passed through the statutory hierarchy, and the suit did not allege lack of competence, ultra vires levy, or collection beyond statutory authority. Civil court jurisdiction was therefore barred, and the challenge had to be pursued only through the statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40584</link>
      <description>Where a taxing statute gives finality to assessment orders and provides appellate and revisional remedies, a civil suit will not lie merely to challenge the correctness of the assessment or the demand quantified under it. Here, the assessment had already passed through the statutory hierarchy, and the suit did not allege lack of competence, ultra vires levy, or collection beyond statutory authority. Civil court jurisdiction was therefore barred, and the challenge had to be pursued only through the statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>