https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765018 HC set aside the adjudicating order under Section 74(9) of the WBGST/CGST Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The court found the assessing authority failed to consider key submissions-particularly the effects of retrospective cancellation of suppliers' registrations and proof of goods' movement-amounting to a breach of natural justice. The prior writ order and the adjudication order dated 10.07.2024 were quashed. Appellants may file a fresh reply with supporting decisions and documents, and the adjudicating authority must decide the case on merits after affording a personal hearing to the appellants' authorized representative. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765018 HC set aside the adjudicating order under Section 74(9) of the WBGST/CGST Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The court found the assessing authority failed to consider key submissions-particularly the effects of retrospective cancellation of suppliers' registrations and proof of goods' movement-amounting to a breach of natural justice. The prior writ order and the adjudication order dated 10.07.2024 were quashed. Appellants may file a fresh reply with supporting decisions and documents, and the adjudicating authority must decide the case on merits after affording a personal hearing to the appellants' authorized representative. Case-Laws GST Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765018