<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40580</link>
    <description>Excise valuation had to be based on the wholesale cash price at the factory gate, not on sales to consumers. The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned excise demand and the orders of the Assistant Collector and Appellate Collector, noting the respondents&#039; no objection. It also preserved the authorities&#039; power to redetermine the wholesale cash price in accordance with law after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40580</link>
      <description>Excise valuation had to be based on the wholesale cash price at the factory gate, not on sales to consumers. The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned excise demand and the orders of the Assistant Collector and Appellate Collector, noting the respondents&#039; no objection. It also preserved the authorities&#039; power to redetermine the wholesale cash price in accordance with law after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>