<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1497 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460404</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat dismissed assessee appeals and partly allowed Revenue appeals regarding bogus purchases. CIT(A) had restricted addition from 100% to 6% of bogus purchases. ITAT upheld the 6% addition following precedent in Pankaj K. Chaudhary case, noting no change in facts or law and Revenue&#039;s inability to produce controverting material. The tribunal confirmed the restricted addition rate rather than the original 100% addition sought by Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1497 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460404</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat dismissed assessee appeals and partly allowed Revenue appeals regarding bogus purchases. CIT(A) had restricted addition from 100% to 6% of bogus purchases. ITAT upheld the 6% addition following precedent in Pankaj K. Chaudhary case, noting no change in facts or law and Revenue&#039;s inability to produce controverting material. The tribunal confirmed the restricted addition rate rather than the original 100% addition sought by Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>