https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40578 Production slips found to be tampered with, together with laboratory confirmation and staff statements, were treated as evidence that the recorded figures reflected actual production omitted from Central Excise accounts. On that basis, the unexplained excess production was treated as clandestinely cleared with intent to evade duty, and the duty demand and personal penalty were sustained. The revision application was rejected. en-us Sat, 26 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 May 2010 17:55:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40578 Production slips found to be tampered with, together with laboratory confirmation and staff statements, were treated as evidence that the recorded figures reflected actual production omitted from Central Excise accounts. On that basis, the unexplained excess production was treated as clandestinely cleared with intent to evade duty, and the duty demand and personal penalty were sustained. The revision application was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 26 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40578