https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460394 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, concluding that the HC exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 226 by re-evaluating evidence and acting beyond its supervisory role. The trial and revisional courts had found sufficient evidence of subletting, justifying the eviction order. The SC upheld these findings, noting that the HC's interpretation of the situation as a casual licence was unsupported by evidence or pleadings. Consequently, the SC restored the eviction decrees issued by the lower courts, affirming the unauthorized subletting by the 4th respondent. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:54:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460394 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, concluding that the HC exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 226 by re-evaluating evidence and acting beyond its supervisory role. The trial and revisional courts had found sufficient evidence of subletting, justifying the eviction order. The SC upheld these findings, noting that the HC's interpretation of the situation as a casual licence was unsupported by evidence or pleadings. Consequently, the SC restored the eviction decrees issued by the lower courts, affirming the unauthorized subletting by the 4th respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460394