<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1001 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764937</link>
    <description>Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 is confined to cases where a patent and manifest error is shown on the face of the record. The stated threshold requires more than disagreement with the earlier decision; an error must be apparent from the record itself. On perusal of the review petitions, no such error was found and no ground satisfying the review standard was established, so the petitions did not meet the requirements for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1001 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764937</link>
      <description>Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 is confined to cases where a patent and manifest error is shown on the face of the record. The stated threshold requires more than disagreement with the earlier decision; an error must be apparent from the record itself. On perusal of the review petitions, no such error was found and no ground satisfying the review standard was established, so the petitions did not meet the requirements for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>