<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1018 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764954</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC allowed the petition challenging retrospective cancellation of GST registration. The court held that without the show cause notice explicitly stating intent for retrospective cancellation, such action cannot be sustained. Following the precedent in Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises case, the court modified the impugned order and quashed the provision directing cancellation from July 2017, instead treating the registration as cancelled from the date of show cause notice issuance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1018 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764954</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC allowed the petition challenging retrospective cancellation of GST registration. The court held that without the show cause notice explicitly stating intent for retrospective cancellation, such action cannot be sustained. Following the precedent in Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises case, the court modified the impugned order and quashed the provision directing cancellation from July 2017, instead treating the registration as cancelled from the date of show cause notice issuance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>