<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1025 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764961</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC addressed multiple issues in a case involving a show cause cum demand notice regarding the classification of &#039;Chyawanprash Awaleha&#039; under GST regulations. The court found jurisdictional concerns with the notice, warranting a stay on further proceedings. It recognized the need for further examination of the product&#039;s classification, questioned the invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 74 of the CGST Act, and found trademark allegations unsubstantiated. The court also debated the binding nature of GST Council recommendations and acknowledged significant jurisdictional arguments, scheduling further hearings to resolve these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1025 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764961</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC addressed multiple issues in a case involving a show cause cum demand notice regarding the classification of &#039;Chyawanprash Awaleha&#039; under GST regulations. The court found jurisdictional concerns with the notice, warranting a stay on further proceedings. It recognized the need for further examination of the product&#039;s classification, questioned the invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 74 of the CGST Act, and found trademark allegations unsubstantiated. The court also debated the binding nature of GST Council recommendations and acknowledged significant jurisdictional arguments, scheduling further hearings to resolve these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>