https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460372 Regulation 9 of the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority Regulations, 2017 and the related resolution allowing complaints to be heard by single benches were valid, because they regulated assignment of matters and were consistent with the statutory power to delegate. RERA complaints could be maintained against a bank only where the bank, as secured creditor, had invoked measures under section 13(4) of SARFAESI and thereby stepped into the promoter-linked dispute. RERA does not retrospectively unsettle pre-existing mortgages or security interests, except where fraud or collusion is shown. Where RERA and SARFAESI conflict, the protective scheme under RERA prevails to the extent of inconsistency. en-us Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:07:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460372 Regulation 9 of the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority Regulations, 2017 and the related resolution allowing complaints to be heard by single benches were valid, because they regulated assignment of matters and were consistent with the statutory power to delegate. RERA complaints could be maintained against a bank only where the bank, as secured creditor, had invoked measures under section 13(4) of SARFAESI and thereby stepped into the promoter-linked dispute. RERA does not retrospectively unsettle pre-existing mortgages or security interests, except where fraud or collusion is shown. Where RERA and SARFAESI conflict, the protective scheme under RERA prevails to the extent of inconsistency. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460372