<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (10) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40541</link>
    <description>Confiscation of tobacco and penalty were held unsustainable where misuse of the sale note was not established and the alleged transit delay did not justify punitive action. The authorities had themselves found no case of double transport or misuse of the sale note, leaving only the delay allegation. On the stated facts, including a sale note commencement time of 9.00 p.m. and undisputed arrival at 8.00 a.m. the next day, no actionable delay was shown to support seizure or confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (10) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40541</link>
      <description>Confiscation of tobacco and penalty were held unsustainable where misuse of the sale note was not established and the alleged transit delay did not justify punitive action. The authorities had themselves found no case of double transport or misuse of the sale note, leaving only the delay allegation. On the stated facts, including a sale note commencement time of 9.00 p.m. and undisputed arrival at 8.00 a.m. the next day, no actionable delay was shown to support seizure or confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>