https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40540 The court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of excise duty on rasching rings, determining them to be porcelainwares subject to excise duty under Sub-item (4) of Item 23B. The court upheld the decisions of the taxing authorities, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding the classification of the product as chinaware and the application of glaze criteria. The petition was dismissed with costs, and the security deposit was ordered to be refunded to the petitioner. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 May 2010 13:17:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40540 The court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of excise duty on rasching rings, determining them to be porcelainwares subject to excise duty under Sub-item (4) of Item 23B. The court upheld the decisions of the taxing authorities, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding the classification of the product as chinaware and the application of glaze criteria. The petition was dismissed with costs, and the security deposit was ordered to be refunded to the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40540