https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460368 Personal cultivation is not an invariable requirement to establish private land; it is needed only where land originally shown as ryoti is alleged to have been converted before the statutory cut-off. The earlier Full Bench rule in Periannan remained good law because the later Supreme Court decision was confined to its own facts and was not irreconcilably inconsistent with that precedent. On the proved facts, repeated short-term and terminable leases, enhanced rent, and tenant acknowledgments supported the inference that the lands were private lands, entitling the landholders to ryotwari pattas; one matter was remitted for reconsideration on the correct legal test and another was dismissed on its facts. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:34:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460368 Personal cultivation is not an invariable requirement to establish private land; it is needed only where land originally shown as ryoti is alleged to have been converted before the statutory cut-off. The earlier Full Bench rule in Periannan remained good law because the later Supreme Court decision was confined to its own facts and was not irreconcilably inconsistent with that precedent. On the proved facts, repeated short-term and terminable leases, enhanced rent, and tenant acknowledgments supported the inference that the lands were private lands, entitling the landholders to ryotwari pattas; one matter was remitted for reconsideration on the correct legal test and another was dismissed on its facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460368