<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (10) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40535</link>
    <description>Authorities may use a trade panel&#039;s opinion to identify tobacco in a warehouse when the stock records do not clearly establish its variety, provided the trader knows of the proceedings, participates through a representative, and is later given the opinion for objection. That use of expert opinion is not an illegal delegation of quasi-judicial power where the panel only assists on identification. Once clandestine removal and substitution of stock are found, the original quantity is treated as removed in breach of the rules, duty becomes payable on that quantity, dryage allowance is denied, and the substituted stock is liable to confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (10) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40535</link>
      <description>Authorities may use a trade panel&#039;s opinion to identify tobacco in a warehouse when the stock records do not clearly establish its variety, provided the trader knows of the proceedings, participates through a representative, and is later given the opinion for objection. That use of expert opinion is not an illegal delegation of quasi-judicial power where the panel only assists on identification. Once clandestine removal and substitution of stock are found, the original quantity is treated as removed in breach of the rules, duty becomes payable on that quantity, dryage allowance is denied, and the substituted stock is liable to confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>