<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460366</link>
    <description>Municipal taxation power to fix and levy property tax was upheld where the statute supplied policy, purpose, budgeting requirements, municipal fund controls and governmental supervision, so the absence of an express maximum rate did not by itself make the delegation excessive or unconstitutional. The assessment for the year was also sustained because the Taxation Rules allowed the Commissioner to maintain either one assessment-book or separate ward assessment-books; ward-wise books were not mandatory. Authentication under the rules was treated as having limited evidentiary function and did not affect accrual of tax liability, so the bills and demand notices remained valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460366</link>
      <description>Municipal taxation power to fix and levy property tax was upheld where the statute supplied policy, purpose, budgeting requirements, municipal fund controls and governmental supervision, so the absence of an express maximum rate did not by itself make the delegation excessive or unconstitutional. The assessment for the year was also sustained because the Taxation Rules allowed the Commissioner to maintain either one assessment-book or separate ward assessment-books; ward-wise books were not mandatory. Authentication under the rules was treated as having limited evidentiary function and did not affect accrual of tax liability, so the bills and demand notices remained valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>