https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460364 The SC dismissed the petitions filed under Article 32 for regularization and absorption of petitioners as helpers in the Electricity Board. The Court held that the petitioners, who claimed to be contract laborers, did not demonstrate any violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, and 21. It concluded that the Khalid Commission's guidelines for regularization did not apply to the petitioners, as they neither participated in the Commission's proceedings nor demonstrated eligibility. The Court emphasized that Article 32 is not for speculative inquiries and requires clear evidence of fundamental rights violations. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:30:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460364 The SC dismissed the petitions filed under Article 32 for regularization and absorption of petitioners as helpers in the Electricity Board. The Court held that the petitioners, who claimed to be contract laborers, did not demonstrate any violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, and 21. It concluded that the Khalid Commission's guidelines for regularization did not apply to the petitioners, as they neither participated in the Commission's proceedings nor demonstrated eligibility. The Court emphasized that Article 32 is not for speculative inquiries and requires clear evidence of fundamental rights violations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460364