https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764869 The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, finding sufficient evidence of the petitioners' involvement in manufacturing activities. It deferred jurisdictional challenges regarding the Jaipur authorities to the competent authority, stating these issues should be addressed during the response to the show cause notice. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioners should pursue alternate remedies available through statutory processes, especially given the presence of disputed facts. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764869 The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, finding sufficient evidence of the petitioners' involvement in manufacturing activities. It deferred jurisdictional challenges regarding the Jaipur authorities to the competent authority, stating these issues should be addressed during the response to the show cause notice. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioners should pursue alternate remedies available through statutory processes, especially given the presence of disputed facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764869