https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764876 Bombay HC held that petitioner's admission of service tax liability in communication dated June 19, 2019 qualified as "quantified" under SVLDRS 2019, making petitioner eligible for the scheme benefits. The court found respondent's rejection of petitioner's application and subsequent show cause notice unsustainable, noting that admitted liability during enquiry constitutes quantified duty under the scheme's definition. The impugned orders were quashed and matter remanded to Designated Committee to reconsider petitioner's declaration and grant consequential relief. Petition allowed by way of remand. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764876 Bombay HC held that petitioner's admission of service tax liability in communication dated June 19, 2019 qualified as "quantified" under SVLDRS 2019, making petitioner eligible for the scheme benefits. The court found respondent's rejection of petitioner's application and subsequent show cause notice unsustainable, noting that admitted liability during enquiry constitutes quantified duty under the scheme's definition. The impugned orders were quashed and matter remanded to Designated Committee to reconsider petitioner's declaration and grant consequential relief. Petition allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764876