<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 946 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764882</link>
    <description>A bail condition restricting movement outside the NCR Region was modified by the SC. The request concerning condition no. 4(ii) was not pressed, while the surviving request on condition no. 4(i) was accepted. The Court substituted the condition so that the respondent shall not leave the limits of the NCR Region without the permission of the concerned Special PMLA Court at Patiala House. The modification application was therefore allowed only in part, confined to condition no. 4(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 946 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764882</link>
      <description>A bail condition restricting movement outside the NCR Region was modified by the SC. The request concerning condition no. 4(ii) was not pressed, while the surviving request on condition no. 4(i) was accepted. The Court substituted the condition so that the respondent shall not leave the limits of the NCR Region without the permission of the concerned Special PMLA Court at Patiala House. The modification application was therefore allowed only in part, confined to condition no. 4(i).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>