<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 957 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764893</link>
    <description>In a serious fraud prosecution under the Companies Act, the Court treated prolonged custody, the nascent stage of trial, compliance with interim bail, and bona fide revival efforts for the affected projects as relevant to the statutory twin conditions for bail, and found reasonable grounds to believe the applicants were not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences on bail. Applying constructive custody, it held that a person already on interim bail remains under judicial control for deciding regular bail, so fresh physical surrender was not required where interim conditions had been observed. Regular bail was granted on conditions, without affecting the merits of the pending case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 957 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764893</link>
      <description>In a serious fraud prosecution under the Companies Act, the Court treated prolonged custody, the nascent stage of trial, compliance with interim bail, and bona fide revival efforts for the affected projects as relevant to the statutory twin conditions for bail, and found reasonable grounds to believe the applicants were not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences on bail. Applying constructive custody, it held that a person already on interim bail remains under judicial control for deciding regular bail, so fresh physical surrender was not required where interim conditions had been observed. Regular bail was granted on conditions, without affecting the merits of the pending case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>