https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460339 An appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 could not be entertained after the expiry of the outer limit of ninety days, because the second proviso was treated as an express exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Applying Section 29(2), the Court held that the general condonation provision in Sections 4 to 24 applies to special laws only where not expressly excluded, and the structure and object of Section 21 showed a strict limitation scheme. Section 12 of the Limitation Act was not excluded, but that did not preserve an appeal filed beyond the permissible period. The delay-condonation application was therefore not maintainable. en-us Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:06:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460339 An appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 could not be entertained after the expiry of the outer limit of ninety days, because the second proviso was treated as an express exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Applying Section 29(2), the Court held that the general condonation provision in Sections 4 to 24 applies to special laws only where not expressly excluded, and the structure and object of Section 21 showed a strict limitation scheme. Section 12 of the Limitation Act was not excluded, but that did not preserve an appeal filed beyond the permissible period. The delay-condonation application was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460339