https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460351 The Telangana HC dismissed a petition challenging CCI's order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 directing investigation into alleged abuse of dominant position. The Court held that CCI's prima facie opinion formation is administrative, requiring only determination whether allegations, if true, constitute competition law violations without examining merits. The Court ruled that same cause of action can invoke remedies under different laws, and breach of fundamental rights claims are independent from abuse of dominance proceedings. Finding the CCI's reasoned order valid and within jurisdiction, the HC directed the Director General to complete investigation according to law. en-us Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:06:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460351 The Telangana HC dismissed a petition challenging CCI's order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 directing investigation into alleged abuse of dominant position. The Court held that CCI's prima facie opinion formation is administrative, requiring only determination whether allegations, if true, constitute competition law violations without examining merits. The Court ruled that same cause of action can invoke remedies under different laws, and breach of fundamental rights claims are independent from abuse of dominance proceedings. Finding the CCI's reasoned order valid and within jurisdiction, the HC directed the Director General to complete investigation according to law. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460351