<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40503</link>
    <description>A conviction cannot stand where it rests on a penal provision that was not in force on the date of the alleged offence. The text states that Section 9(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 had not been incorporated into the statute when the act occurred, so the guilty plea could not cure the fundamental defect of applying an inapplicable offence provision. The conviction and sentence were therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for retrial under the law applicable at the material time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40503</link>
      <description>A conviction cannot stand where it rests on a penal provision that was not in force on the date of the alleged offence. The text states that Section 9(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 had not been incorporated into the statute when the act occurred, so the guilty plea could not cure the fundamental defect of applying an inapplicable offence provision. The conviction and sentence were therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for retrial under the law applicable at the material time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>