<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40498</link>
    <description>The court upheld the seizure of a car under the Customs Act, dismissing a petition seeking its return pending adjudication. Emphasizing the Act&#039;s broad definition of &#039;goods&#039; to include vehicles used in smuggling, the court rejected arguments based on previous judgments and the car&#039;s intended use for a wedding. Stressing the Act&#039;s provisions on combating smuggling and the obligation for timely confiscation proceedings, the court found no grounds to release the car and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40498</link>
      <description>The court upheld the seizure of a car under the Customs Act, dismissing a petition seeking its return pending adjudication. Emphasizing the Act&#039;s broad definition of &#039;goods&#039; to include vehicles used in smuggling, the court rejected arguments based on previous judgments and the car&#039;s intended use for a wedding. Stressing the Act&#039;s provisions on combating smuggling and the obligation for timely confiscation proceedings, the court found no grounds to release the car and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>