<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40493</link>
    <description>The court set aside the initial assessment of imported machinery at 35% ad valorem under Item 72(b) of the Indian Customs Tariff and ordered a refund at 10% under entry No. 72(15). The court emphasized that classification under 72(15) is not limited by the machinery&#039;s capability to produce chappals, directing a comprehensive assessment of all relevant factors. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal by the revisional authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40493</link>
      <description>The court set aside the initial assessment of imported machinery at 35% ad valorem under Item 72(b) of the Indian Customs Tariff and ordered a refund at 10% under entry No. 72(15). The court emphasized that classification under 72(15) is not limited by the machinery&#039;s capability to produce chappals, directing a comprehensive assessment of all relevant factors. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal by the revisional authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>