<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 896 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764832</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC ruled in favor of the petitioner in a service tax dispute concerning tyre retreading business. The court held that service tax should be levied only on the service component, not the entire turnover value. The petitioner had properly bifurcated material costs (subject to VAT) and labor charges (subject to service tax) in their invoices, which the revenue authorities did not dispute. Following SC precedent in Safety Retreading Company case, the court rejected the revenue&#039;s contention of alternative remedy and upheld constitutional separation of tax powers. The writ petitions were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 896 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764832</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC ruled in favor of the petitioner in a service tax dispute concerning tyre retreading business. The court held that service tax should be levied only on the service component, not the entire turnover value. The petitioner had properly bifurcated material costs (subject to VAT) and labor charges (subject to service tax) in their invoices, which the revenue authorities did not dispute. Following SC precedent in Safety Retreading Company case, the court rejected the revenue&#039;s contention of alternative remedy and upheld constitutional separation of tax powers. The writ petitions were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>